It’s good they have done this, thanks for advice Martin Butterfield.
But maybe they could do an index just of common birds names, not mixed in
with the scientific names.
This would save on paper too and be relevant for most users.
CSIRO, could you do this please?
Thanks
Wendy McWilliams
Glen Waverley
Message: 4
From: Steve Clark < bukoba.steve@gmail.com>
To: Martin Butterfield < martinflab@gmail.com>, Birding-Aus
< birding-aus@birding-aus.org>
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Have I been asleep?
Message-ID:
< CAHcKffMEx5bo9-7Pw6+aMTBkJYoUm7sKFD0=_=cQuhtKv54CAg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”UTF-8″
Hopefully the new index will find its way into the first revision. The new
Birds of Indonesia book has the same problem with its index.
Cheers
Steve Clark
Hamilton, Vic
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Martin Butterfield < martinflab@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I haven’t seen any mention on this group about CSIRO releasing a pdf
> file containing a traditional index for the Australian Bird as a .pdf
> file
> long but definitely legible if printed as 2 pages per A4 sheet (and
> might be at 4 pages per sheet if really keen on cutting down weight
> and not cutting down trees).
>
> Good to see a +ve response to criticism.
>
> Martin Butterfield
> franmart.blogspot.com.au/
>
>
Birding-Aus mailing list
>
Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
>
To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
>
> birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
>
>
Birding-Aus mailing list
Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
