I will have another go. Of course as a biologist, I would always use the word sex, not gender, in the context that Denise did. However I thought the response that this was wrong, to be harsh and unnecessary. It is a reasonable use and I believe not wrong.
The main point is: where do you draw the dividing line. If humans have gender characteristics, surely the identical gender characteristics are shown in gorillas and chimpanzees, then what about monkeys, that are almost the same, then indeed most mammals. Who would deny that a bull is masculine and a cow is feminine? Why not birds, indeed many insects and anything else you would care to consider, such as the parts of plants that are different between male and females, all these have fundamentally the same masculine and feminine characteristics. Those are words about gender. These characteristics are dictated as a consequence of the difference in size, number and motility between eggs and sperm, or pollen and ova in plants. Yes they are expressed in a myriad of ways, according to the lifestyle of the species but all come back to the same start point. Of course there is the peripheral complication of reversed sexual dimorphism in goshawks.
So yes normally we would us the word sex in that context. However these gender characteristics occur throughout most living things and at their fundamentals, they are remarkably consistent. Therefore I see nothing wrong with referring to them as gender things, even though it is a minor use and horribly confused with the complications of grammar use, such as that a ship is of the female gender and a car is male, or by gender defined genus (and family?) names or the female gender of a tropical cyclone. I even recall that in one other language, the word for vagina is male gender but I have forgotten the details. That just shows how silly this all is. Or the complication of prudishness against using the word sex, (though I’m not sure how important that is). Even though that gets messy, such as: “when did you last have sex”? Well of course I have it right now (meaning I am still male).
It is not unusual for words to have various meanings, even the opposite of what they should mean. Consider the word “temper”: “He has a temper” should mean he is a calm and actually temperate but it is used for the opposite. And don’t get me started on “decimate”, now often used as though it means devastate, instead of the trivial act of killing 10% of a population.
Philip
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au
http://birding-aus.org ===============================
