Duck shooting #2

More on the judgement in the recent trial of the ‘Kerang Five’, handed down on Thursday. Five rescuers were charged on the closing day of last year’s season with various offences including ‘operating noise producing equipment, being a whistle, in a manner likely to cause unreasonable inconvenience or nuisance to any person contrary to the Wildlife (SGR) Regulations 2004’. Bright clothing is worn, whistles are blown and flags waved to divert ducks. Each of the five rescuers was found guilty of only one of their five charges – hindering hunters or blowing whistles. All charges of harrassing hunters were not proven. Magistrate Peter Mealy awarded $18,000 court costs against the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), with the Department of Primary Industries (DPI) prosecuting, because of the heavy-handedness of DSE wildlife officers in arresting rescuers. He criticised the wildlife officers for continuing to question a rescuer with mild hypothermia before allowing her to seek help. He said that it is legal for rescuers to be on the water. He expressed surprise that the Department did not provide care for injured birds at the wetlands and indicated that it appeared to hold rescuers responsible for the provision of vets, when the Department should be responsible for the welfare of wildlife. No rescuers were convicted or fined. All accepted three-month good behaviour bonds. The DSE no longer administers the duck hunt – this is done by DPI – but its wildlife officers were again on duty at this year’s opening weekend. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-08/duck-rescuers-claim-victory-in-court-case/4059616 ===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au

http://birding-aus.org ===============================