https://www.theage.com.au/world/oceania/new-zealand-bird-of-the-year-voter-fraud-scandal-has-kiwis-in-a-flap-20201111-p56di6.html
|
||||
|
The present subspecies are taken from the 2-volume BLI/HBW Checklist.
Birdlife Australia regards them as important for Birdlife Australia conservation purposes. From BLA website:
However, defining all Australia’s bird taxa (species and subspecies) does matter for conservation; it is difficult to monitor and protect birds if they . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review Today on Mt Franklin Road (Brindabella Ranges, ACT), about 2.5 km beyond the final locked gate I heard two male Olive Whistlers calling at each other using the call the various field guides describes as 'tu WIT tu', but prefacing it with three even notes: 'tu tu tu, tu WIT tu'. One male was calling . . . → Read More: Interesting Olive Whistler behaviour If Birdlife Australia makes no independent taxonomic judgments and BLI does no deal with subspecies how come BLA lists them? On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 12:21, Geoffrey Dabb <gdabb@iinet.net.au> wrote: Yes. We are talking about the strange and shifting world of global lists. Noel mentioned different global lists, and Phil commented . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review I was indeed referring to BirdLife International (BLI), and their is used by various legal and conservation bodies so it is still quite significant, though now somewhat in need of an update. Unfortunately their taxonomy will be shoe-horned into the Clements version by Cornell / E-bird, a great pity but there we are, presumably HBWAlive . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review Yes. We are talking about the strange and shifting world of global lists. Noel mentioned different global lists, and Phil commented on different taxonomic approaches, including ‘Birdlife’. This must mean Birdlife International (BLI), as Birdlife Australia makes no independent taxonomic judgments. Until version 9.1 in 2017 BLI offered a checklist (no subspecies), stating . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review But BirdLife Australia does do subspecies! On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 08:41, Geoffrey Dabb <gdabb@iinet.net.au> wrote: Birdlife by itself did not do subspecies. Cornell Lab has now swallowed HBW but the digestion process has its difficulties. Look at the jumbled entry for ‘Grey Whistler P. simplex’. Has it been counted as . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review Birdlife by itself did not do subspecies. Cornell Lab has now swallowed HBW but the digestion process has its difficulties. Look at the jumbled entry for ‘Grey Whistler P. simplex’. Has it been counted as an Australian endemic species? Consider also the shrike-tits.
From: Phil Gregory <oreornis@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 9 . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review Birdlife hands down, then IOC…… Phil Gregory oreornis@gmail.com ornithological writer/tour leader/tour facilitator Field Guides / Sicklebill Safaris / Cassowary ToursPO Box 597MalandaQLD 4885AustraliaPh: +61 7 4096 8063 Email: info@s2travel.com.auWebsite1: http://www.sicklebillsafaris.com OR www.birder.travel Website 2: http://www.cassowarytours.com.au
On 9 Nov 2020, at 9:42 AM, Geoffrey Dabb <gdabb@iinet.net.au> wrote: Shades of that old cold war question: ‘Who has the . . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review Shades of that old cold war question: ‘Who has the best Germans?’ Who has the most creative taxonomists?
From: Birding-Aus <birding-aus-bounces@birding-aus.org> On Behalf Of Phil GregorySent: Monday, 9 November 2020 10:12 AMTo: Noel Luff <noelluff@gmail.com>Cc: Birding Aus <birding-aus@birding-aus.org>Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] All The Birds of the World: Review
. . . → Read More: All The Birds of the World: Review |
||||
Comments are closed 