Author: regl

  • Development on Black-breasted Button-quail habitat

    Friends,

    Previously we have had a discussion on the proper response of birding organisations to a plan to use 200 hectares of Black-breasted Button-quail habitat for a development of 6,500 people

    The Rainbow Shores development is on the Inskip Peninsula immediately south of Fraser Island in Queensland. The development was refused by the Gympie Regional Council on the instructions of the Department of Environment and Resource Management and the developer has appealed. A number of individuals and groups have joined the action to oppose the develoment. (Fraser Island Defenders Organisation, Citizens Helping Inskip Peninsula, Cooloola Coastcare, National Parks Association of Queensland) I thought that people may be interested in a quick update.

    The trial is set down for 3 weeks from 16th January 2012 with a site inspection on the 6th and 7th December 2011. So the crunch is coming as we seek to protect the BBBQ and its habitat. It’s a bit scary.

    More information is available on http://www.saveinskip.org.au/docs/Newsletter_Nov_2011_Screen.pdf or on background the CHIP website http://www.inskip.org

    Regards

    Reg Lawler regl@bigpond.com

    ===============================

    To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au

    http://birding-aus.org ===============================

  • Application for Permits atLeanyerSewageFarm, NT

    That’s OK Ross. I shouldn’t have attacked the OHS people I’m OK attacking lawyers and the law as I think that that are wrong and some of the lawyers are ambulance chasers and advertise the fact..

    The point that I was making, ineffectively, was that there should be a balance between freedom and safety and this applies to access to Birding sites held publicly. If someone cries “safety” it should not be a complete justification without further examination.

    Have you ever looked at the signs that say “Crest” on the road and wonder why they are there? You are going up a hill and the road disappears. You can see that it is a crest and I’m not sure why you need the sign. Yet millions of dollars have been spent and each sign is a minor distraction because someone cried “safety”

    I know how to avoid crocodiles. I know how to lobby MP’s

    Regards

    Reg lawler

    . —– Original Message —– From: “Ross Macfarlane” To: “Reg” ; “‘Birding-aus’” Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] NOTICE: Application for Permits atLeanyerSewageFarm, NT

    > I’m sorry. I shouldn’t have sent that. > > —–Original Message—– > From: Ross Macfarlane > Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 11:43 AM > To: Reg ; ‘Birding-aus’ > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] NOTICE: Application for Permits > atLeanyerSewageFarm, NT > > Reg, thanks for that. Can I ask that if you ever come to my worksite you > be > sure to reiterate those views so I know damn well not to let you through > the > gate. > > As to the legal responsibilities, if you don’t like the way the law is > written you are welcome to run for parliament and seek to get them > changed. > The Commonwealth, 6 states and 2 territories have spent the last 10 years > trying to come up with a nationally harmonised approach to OHS, but I’m > sure > they won’t bat an eye at chucking it all out to suit your personal > reluctance to spend an hour having someone explain to you how not to get > eaten by a crocodile. > > —–Original Message—– > From: Reg > Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 7:32 AM > To: ‘Birding-aus’ > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] NOTICE: Application for Permits > atLeanyerSewageFarm, NT > > Isn’t it amazing that people make a living restricting the freedom of > others. > > Once upon a time people took the reesponsibility for their own safety. > Captain Cook and Mawson and my parents took risks without the benefit of > the bureaucrats and others deciding what was safe. Accidents happen and > we > should certainly seek toprevent them but there is a point where the > benefits > of safety are less than the benefits of freedom. Otherwise we would never > drive. This discussion shows illustrates that we have well and truly > passed > the point of benefit of more regulations. > > If the best argument for rules is to prevent the legal system from > employing > itself harrassing us, we should protest and get the lawyers to move on to > work with a public benefit. If the law is wrong we should change the law. > > Those who benefit from our continuing acceptance of their right to rule > our > lives will not give up easily. The lawyers and OH& S officers make a nice > living at this. We are presently giving evereythiong up as a “safety” > issue > and moving beyond the Americans in suiing each other. > > Any landowner has the right to refuse access of course. If the public > authorities wish to do this, they can. And we, as the owners, then lobby > our representatives for the return of access. Perhaps some signs could > solve problems? But let’s not just give up for a vision of a risk free > future and the domination of the lawyers and experts. > > Reg Lawler > > > > To: “Ross Macfarlane” > Cc: “‘Birding-aus’” > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 11:59 AM > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] NOTICE: Application for Permits at > LeanyerSewageFarm, NT > > > Ross, > > Glad to hear that NTP&W will wear the public liability for visitors at > Leanyer. > > I also heartily agree with your comments about people being smart > about safety. I have seen birders do some pretty dumb things, just so > they can get a good view of a bird. Fortunately, the worst accident I > have seen was $2000 odd of binoculars bouncing down a canyon when the > owner lost his grip while hanging over a guard rail, while trying to > get a better view of an American Dipper. > > Cheers, > > Carl Clifford > > On 23/09/2011, at 11:40 AM, Ross Macfarlane wrote: > > Carl, > > NTP&W not only has the right, they have the legal responsibility under > work health and safety laws to restrict access to their sites by > people who haven’t been inducted and had the hazards at the site > explained to them. It’s actually the other way around from what you > describe: they are legally responsible from a public liability > standpoint for visitors (unlike commercial contractors.) But you are > right that if as an inducted person you take an un-inducted person > into the WTP, you would have a responsibility to ensure they obey the > rules and don’t get hurt. > > I’m a health and safety consultant by profession, and I’ve also been > the volunteer safety officer for the Victorian Malleefowl Recovery > Group for over 10 years. We take a strenuously professional approach > to safety – all our volunteers have to be trained and all have to make > daily scheduled call-ins to safety officers when in the field, > otherwise we ask Parks Victoria rangers to go out and check they’re > OK. Taking safety seriously has been really important in keeping > ongoing support (including financially) from PV for our work. > > I really encourage all volunteer conservation groups to get smart > about safety. If you behave responsibly and professionally TPTB* will > support you. If not, they can make life hard, because you make their > life hard. > > Cheers, > Ross Macfarlane > > *-he -owers -hat -e > > —–Original Message—– From: Carl Clifford > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 9:45 AM > To: Chris Sanderson > Cc: Peter Kyne ; birding-aus@vicnet.net.au > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] NOTICE: Application for Permits at Leanyer > SewageFarm, NT > > Hi Chris, > > I was not arguing for any side. I was just pointing out the possible > legal implications for authorised key holders who allow non-inducted > people to accompany them or loan keys to (which I believe does happen) > > NTP&W make the rules, as does any landholder, for access to their > property and we must follow them. If people do not follow NTP&W’s > rules, we are likely to see birders locked out of Leanyer completely. > > Cheers, > > Carl Clifford > > > On 23/09/2011, at 8:41 AM, Chris Sanderson wrote: > > Hi Carl, > > You are spot on, but I think you are looking at this issue from the > wrong side – part of the reason for refusal to renew permits was that > NTP&W’s concern that people were entering Leanyer without having done > an induction, illegally. Some were sneaking in behind others with > keys, others were getting in having borrowed a key. Essentially the > kind of behaviour you are arguing birders should be able to continue > almost spoiled it for everyone. For a while it looked like birders > might not be allowed back in at all! So to be honest, if organising > to do an induction is too much of a hassle for your holiday, then > maybe choose another site to bird at. > > I briefly flagged these issues when the original closure happened back > in October last year: > http://bird-o.com/2010/10/02/living-leanyer-a-birding-jewel/ > > No one has said key holders won’t be able to take non-inductees with > them at this stage, so perhaps that will still be allowed? Personally > I’m glad that locals in NT have been able to work with NTP&W to > arrange access again, it would have been sad if the closure had > remained permanently. > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Carl Clifford > wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Well, that opens a can of worms. NTP&W making an OH&S induction course > a condition for a permit places any permit holder who allows a person > who has not completed the induction to accompany them to Leanyer in an > invidious position. NTP&W has shifted the public risk liability onto > the permit holder who allows any non-inducted person to accompany > them. Permit holders who give their key to anyone who has not been > inducted, and allows that person to go into Leanyer by themselves, may > well find themselves even further in the legal deep end. > > This policy may well result in hiring professional guides with public > liability insurance, the only way for visiting birders to visit Leanyer. > > Carl Clifford > > > On 22/09/2011, at 4:31 PM, Simon Mustoe wrote: > > > Hi, > > Peter Kyne has requested that we kindly pass on information from NT > Power and Water, regarding access to Leanyer Sewage Farm. Note, the > application for a permit will only suit locals and the deadline is 30 > September. Here is his message: > > Dear NT Birders, > To assist Power and Water in arranging access to Leanyer Sewage > Ponds, they have asked to I co-ordinate a list of all of those people > interested in obtaining a permit to access the ponds. At this stage > please use me as a central contact point rather than individually > contacting Power and Water. > This is the first step for Power and Water to begin preparing > indemnities and keys, and in upgrading their database. Following this > will be an induction process, > with Power and Water looking at a group induction in the first > instance. Date and time to be advised in due course. So please, don’t > apply if you are not able to make yourself available for this induction, > thanks ; ) > If you wish to obtain a permit, please advise me of the following > details by 12 noon FRIDAY 30 September: > 1. First name and surname > 2. Email address > 3. Residential address > 4. Phone number (home/mobile) > 5. If you are a member of the NTFNC > Permits will be issued for a 3 year period with a $50 key deposit. > Previous key deposits will be honoured. > Many thanks, Pete Kyne > > Peter Kyne, PhD > Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge > Charles Darwin University > Darwin 0909 NT, Australia > Ph: 08 8946 7616 > Mob: 0435 139 322 > > For more information on Leanyer and birding in the Top End, > http://bird-o.com/northern-territory-and-the-top-end/ > > Regards, > > Simon. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Simon Mustoe > Tel: +61 (0) 405220830 | Skype simonmustoe | Email > simonmustoe@ecology-solutions.com.au > > Visit BIRD-O at http://www.bird-o.com > Follow BIRD-O on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/birdodotcom > Like BIRD-O on Facebook? Visit http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/ > pages/Bird-O/117732794921095 > Email BIRD-O at info@bird-o.com > > > > > =============================== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > send the message: > unsubscribe > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) > to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au > > http://birding-aus.org > =============================== > > =============================== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > send the message: > unsubscribe > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) > to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au > > http://birding-aus.org > =============================== > > > > — > > Check out our site: http://www.bird-o.com > Follow us on Facebook (Bird-O) and Twitter (@birdodotcom) > > =============================== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > send the message: > unsubscribe > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) > to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au > > http://birding-aus.org > =============================== > > > > > =============================== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > send the message: > unsubscribe > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) > to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au > > http://birding-aus.org > =============================== > > > —– > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG – www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3913 – Release Date: 09/22/11 > > > =============================== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > send the message: > unsubscribe > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) > to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au > > http://birding-aus.org > =============================== > > > > > —– > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG – www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3917 – Release Date: 09/24/11 >

    ===============================

    To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au

    http://birding-aus.org ===============================

  • Application for Permits at LeanyerSewageFarm, NT

    Isn’t it amazing that people make a living restricting the freedom of others.

    Once upon a time people took the reesponsibility for their own safety. Captain Cook and Mawson and my parents took risks without the benefit of the bureaucrats and others deciding what was safe. Accidents happen and we should certainly seek toprevent them but there is a point where the benefits of safety are less than the benefits of freedom. Otherwise we would never drive. This discussion shows illustrates that we have well and truly passed the point of benefit of more regulations.

    If the best argument for rules is to prevent the legal system from employing itself harrassing us, we should protest and get the lawyers to move on to work with a public benefit. If the law is wrong we should change the law.

    Those who benefit from our continuing acceptance of their right to rule our lives will not give up easily. The lawyers and OH& S officers make a nice living at this. We are presently giving evereythiong up as a “safety” issue and moving beyond the Americans in suiing each other.

    Any landowner has the right to refuse access of course. If the public authorities wish to do this, they can. And we, as the owners, then lobby our representatives for the return of access. Perhaps some signs could solve problems? But let’s not just give up for a vision of a risk free future and the domination of the lawyers and experts.

    Reg Lawler

    To: “Ross Macfarlane” Cc: “‘Birding-aus’” Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] NOTICE: Application for Permits at LeanyerSewageFarm, NT

    Ross,

    Glad to hear that NTP&W will wear the public liability for visitors at Leanyer.

    I also heartily agree with your comments about people being smart about safety. I have seen birders do some pretty dumb things, just so they can get a good view of a bird. Fortunately, the worst accident I have seen was $2000 odd of binoculars bouncing down a canyon when the owner lost his grip while hanging over a guard rail, while trying to get a better view of an American Dipper.

    Cheers,

    Carl Clifford

    On 23/09/2011, at 11:40 AM, Ross Macfarlane wrote:

    Carl,

    NTP&W not only has the right, they have the legal responsibility under work health and safety laws to restrict access to their sites by people who haven’t been inducted and had the hazards at the site explained to them. It’s actually the other way around from what you describe: they are legally responsible from a public liability standpoint for visitors (unlike commercial contractors.) But you are right that if as an inducted person you take an un-inducted person into the WTP, you would have a responsibility to ensure they obey the rules and don’t get hurt.

    I’m a health and safety consultant by profession, and I’ve also been the volunteer safety officer for the Victorian Malleefowl Recovery Group for over 10 years. We take a strenuously professional approach to safety – all our volunteers have to be trained and all have to make daily scheduled call-ins to safety officers when in the field, otherwise we ask Parks Victoria rangers to go out and check they’re OK. Taking safety seriously has been really important in keeping ongoing support (including financially) from PV for our work.

    I really encourage all volunteer conservation groups to get smart about safety. If you behave responsibly and professionally TPTB* will support you. If not, they can make life hard, because you make their life hard.

    Cheers, Ross Macfarlane

    *-he -owers -hat -e

  • Amalgamation

    Hi

    A brief reply to Dr Graeme Hamilton.

    1. I contacted BASQ in 2009 and requested assistance in identifying conclusively the scrapes of the BBBQ in a different area that was going to be developed. I received no reply so I did not take up Dr Hamilton’s suggestion this time. 2. Dr Hamilton, on his own account, received an urgent request for assistance (along with multiple copies of a 15 page brief) in Mid August 2010, but did not reply until I contacted him in January 2011. He did not even acknowledge receipt of the material which took me considerable time and some expense. He did not tell me of any steps that he had taken. After that I became tied up in the Development Appeal before the Planning and Environment Court and did not contact Wingspan etc. I really wanted to contact BOCA members to tell them not to give up their organisation. 3. If BASQ is going to do anything useful it better be in the next fortnight. There is not much they can do at this late stage but in two weeks all the new evidence will have to be in. I’ll be happy if they contact me offering assistance but I won’t hold my breath. 4. I was contacted by a reporter soon after I sent away the brief to BA. Co-operating at all was a mistake as the story was distorted and inaccurate. If Dr Hamilton took offence at that, it would have assisted if he had contacted me rather than cut off communication. I wondered if that was the reason that he had not replied. 5. Dr Watson has completed his report now. If people want to read it I will email them a CD. (It’s about 30 Mb) See what you think.

    BA has been of no assistance in preserving an Important Bird Area from development even though the Recovery Plan for the Black-breasted Button-quail puts habitat protection as the first priority. It has failed. We need BOCA as the smaller, poorer organisation did help with publicity which helped in fund raising

    And we need to win the case which is not as certain as Dr Hamilton seems to think.

    Reg Lawler

    > ===============================

    To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au

    http://birding-aus.org ===============================

  • Amalgamation

    Dear Friends,

    My wife and I are members of both Birds Australia and BOCA. We have been working for over 20 years to preserve some bush on the Inskip Peninsula immediately south of Fraser Island in Queensland. It is an area the Birds Australia list as an Important Bird Area and contains a substantial population of Black-breasted Button-quail amongst others. The 200 hA area has not been substantially changed and is largely original bush.

    An urban development of 6,500 is proposed for an area. My wife and I along with Coastcare, Fraser Island Defenders Organisation, the Department of Environment and Resource Management, Citizens Helping Inskip Peninsula and other individuals are opposing the development in the Planning and Environment Court.

    When I contacted the President and CEO of Birds Australia about the matter they promptly asked for more details. I sent multiple copies of a multipaged color presentation for the Council of Birds Australia to consider and asked for assistance. I was ignored for several months. Eventually the CEO refused any assistance and refused to give me information on the rules of the organisation or ways I may use to contact members.

    BOCA has published an excellent article about the matter and this assistance has been very valuable.

    I have come to the conslusion that we need BOCA and that the proposed amalgamation is more like a takeover with the CEO of Birds Australia in charge. The failure of Birds Australia to support pensioners and community organisations in a long running fight for the future of birds makes BOCA’s independent survival more critical.

    I apologise for the unsolicited email but ask you and your members to vote against amalgamation.

    Reg Lawler Chairperson Citizens Helping Inskip Peninsula PO Box 9 Dagun Qld 4570 http://www.inskip.org/ ===============================

    To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: birding-aus-request@vicnet.net.au

    http://birding-aus.org ===============================