Author: paul

  • Birdlife Victoria Portland Pelagic, Nov 2015 – Trip Report

    BirdLife Victoria Pelagic off Portland, Victoria, Sunday 8 November 2015 Participants: Ruth Woodrow, Tim Bawden, Brian Johnston, David Burren, Mark Buckby, Trevor Hunt, Iian and Alana Denham, John McRae, Jim Wright and Paul Dodd (organiser). Crew: Kev (skipper) and Nick. This was our first trip on a new boat from Portland after the previous operator, Shannon Churchill, sold the Southern Pride to a New Zealand-based charter operator. The new boat, the Timaru is slightly wider than Southern Pride but a little shorter. It is, however, MUCH faster with our trip to the shelf cut to less than two hours compared with two and a half previously. Kevin Treloar, the owner and skipper, was very keen to ensure that we had a good trip – and was very amenable to the directions I provided. Nick, the deckhand was equally receptive to suggestions and was also equally keen that we had a good trip. Activity: Departed Portland Harbour aboard the Timaru at 06.55 heading south-west to the shelf. We stopped right on the shelf break for our first stop at 38°39.422’S, 141°14.432’E in 180 fathoms of water, where we berleyed from 08.50 till 10.10. We moved to the south-east to 38°43.329’S, 141°16.248’E in 500 fathoms and stayed there from 10.40 until 12.00. We moved further east and berleyed at 38°41.924’S, 141°21.860’E in 194 fathoms over a well-known underwater feature called “The Horseshoe” from 12.30 until 13.50. We then headed back to the north-east spending a considerable amount of time circumnavigating Lawrence Rocks, before returning to Portland Harbour and docking at 16.30. No participants were seasick. Conditions: In the harbour there was nil wind and completely flat sea. Once we left the harbour we had no sea and swell of 1-1.5m decreasing to 0.5m during the day. Wind was a light northerly, initially 3-5 knots and easing to 1-2 knots later in the day. It was warm and sunny for the duration of the trip. Summary: A very quiet day on the pond with 19 species of seabird (and three other species seen on the rocks). In addition to low variety, there were low numbers of those species that we did see. The highlight was 15 White-chinned Petrel that magically appeared at the third berley point. Mammals: Common Dolphin: a small pod on the way out and two small pods on the way in. Australian Fur Seal: the normal numbers (about 50) loafing at Lawrence Rocks. One seen inshore on way out. Fish: Shark sp: At second berley point. Initially thought to be Blue Shark, but had unusual white markings on the upper snout and on the top and leading edge of the pectoral fins. “Jellyfish” sp: At second berley point an unusually large number of “jellyfish” of various types including several Portuguese man o’war (Physalia physalis) Birds: Little Pied Cormorant 1 (1). Harbour. Crested Tern 230 (200). Harbour, inshore, offshore and pelagic with around 200 on Lawrence Rocks. Black-faced Cormorant 56 (40). Harbour, inshore and around 40 on Lawrence Rocks. Silver Gull 111 (100). Harbour, inshore and around 100 on Lawrence Rocks. Pacific Gull 1 (1). Harbour. Australasian Gannet ~2000. Inshore, Point Danger (~200) with most on Lawrence Rocks. Shy Albatross 45 (20). Inshore, offshore and pelagic. Most (around 25) at second berley point. Fluttering Shearwater 6 (4). Offshore, 1 pelagic at first berley point. Jaeger sp 1 (1). Inshore between Lawrence Rocks and coast. Not identified definitely to species but considered likely to be Pomeraine. Flying away from us, low to the water, towards a flock of feeding Gannets. Short-tailed Shearwater 550 (200). Several large feeding groups on the water. 6 birds pelagic, 2 at second berley point and 4 at third. Huttons Shearwater 1 (1). Offshore. Fairy Prion 35 (12). Offshore and pelagic. One large group of at least 12 birds on the water as we were heading back in. White-chinned Petrel 40+ (26+). Pelagic. At each berley point with 26+ at third stop. Great-winged Petrel 5 (4). Pelagic. Four gouldi, one macroptera. Antipodean Albatross 1 (1). Pelagic at second stop. Gibsoni. Indian Yellow-nosed Albatross 1 (1). Pelagic at second stop. Little (Fairy) Penguin 3 (2). Offshore. White-fronted Tern 1 (1). Lawrence Rocks – initially identified when flock of 200 Crested Terns took flight. Easily located when the birds settled down again. Good close looks for all on board. Great Cormorant 1 (1). Lawrence Rocks. An unusual sighting at the rocks. Sooty Oystercatcher 2 (2). Lawrence Rocks. Chestnut Teal 2 (2). Lawrence Rocks. Kelp Gull 3 (2). Lawrence Rocks. Little Black Cormorant 3 (3). Lawrence Rocks. Welcome Swallow 3 (3). Lawrence Rocks. All the best, Paul Dodd For details of future Portland trips, go to the BirdLife Australia web site at the bottom of the relevant Birdlife Victoria page at http://www.birdlife.org.au/locations/all-victoria-statewide/activities-vic For reports of past BA-Vic and BirdLife Victoria trips from Portland and Port Fairy, search the Birding-Aus archives for the trip reports at http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/birding-aus/


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Morepork, Cape Liptrap, Victoria

    Hi birders, For those not on Facebook, I have posted a few of the shots that I took of Tasmanian Moreporks at Cape Liptrap last Wednesday night to my website: http://paul.angrybluecat.com/Trips-and-Locations/2015/Cape-Liptrap-Oct-2015/ I will eventually get around to processing some more (I took about 400 shots). Tim Bawden, Ruth Woodrow and I drove from Melbourne on Wednesday evening, arriving around 8:40pm. All in all we saw at least eight birds and probably photographed four or five of them. Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Photography – Nikon lenses

    Hi birders, Nikon has (today) announced a new 200-500mm f/5.6 VR lens. This lens is squarely in the same category as the Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3, Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 and Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lenses – presumably Nikon sees enough value in this market segment to release a version. The Sigma 15-600mm lens retails for about $1350 here in Australia, the Tamron version for about $1200. I don’t have final pricing on the Nikon either here or in the US, but it is expected to retail at $US1399 – so a bit more expensive than the competition. At 500mm maximum zoom it is 100mm shorter than either the current Sigma or the Tamron, but is a constant f/5.6 throughout the zoom range giving it better low light performance at 500mm than either of the others. The Nikon lens appears to come with Nikon’s current magic coatings, and features the latest 4.5 stop vibration reduction system. It sounds like a really good value lens for bird photographers. Details are on the Nikon Australia website here: http://www.nikon.com.au/en_AU/product/nikkor-lenses/fx-format/zoom/telephoto -zoom/af-s-nikkor-200-500mm-f-5-6e-ed-vr And a shorter version of the link here, in case the longer version gets truncated by the birding-aus mail server: http://bit.ly/1OMuKMr Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Highlights from the Portland (Victoria) pelagic on Sunday

    Hi birders, This isn’t the trip report from last Sunday’s Portland (Victoria) pelagic – Chris Lester will post that shortly, I’m sure. For those not on Facebook, you may not be across the news of the sightings. After what we all thought was quite an ordinary day at sea, we were lucky enough to have an adult Salvin’s Albatross fly in at our third berley point – great views were had by all participants and the bird quickly became (by far) the most photographed bird of the trip. Yesterday evening, Tim Bawden loaded a selection of his photos onto Facebook, quite innocently misidentifying a tern that we’d seen as a White-fronted Tern. We had, in fact, seen quite a number of White-fronted terns at sea that day – somewhat unusually. Within a minute or two a number of the seabird experts immediately identified the bird as a juvenile ANTARCTIC TERN! Funnily enough, Scott Baker and I had been discussing the terns that we’d seen, and I think we’d both made a mental note to review the photos when we got back to land, thinking that one of the birds may have been a wayward Arctic Tern because of the shorter bill and translucent secondaries. I had given it no further thought, as I’m sure no-one else had, and had been busily processing and publishing pictures of the Salvin’s Albatross as I was sure that they were the images that people would want to see. According to the experts, though, for our bird to be an Arctic Tern, it would be in reverse breeding cycle, making it a highly unusual bird. Coupled with the black trailing edge to wings the only possibility was Antarctic Tern! As far as I know, Tim’s images are only available on Facebook, but I have managed to publish my images to my web site as well as to Facebook: http://paul.angrybluecat.com/Trips-and-Locations/2015/Portland-Pelagic-Jun-2 015/ Here’s a shorter version of the link in case the birding-aus mailing-list server truncates this one: http://bit.ly/1Ldz1aj I also quickly reviewed Ruth’s images last night and it would appear that she has photographs of at least two, possibly three individual Antarctic Terns. There was one definite Antarctic Tern in the first flight of terns that came through and another bird that looks like a possibility. Then there was another definite Antarctic Tern in the second flight of terns – around 20 minutes later, by my count (but Tim says 40 minutes later). Far from being an ordinary trip, this now makes it one of the most extraordinary (and successful) Portland pelagics of recent years! Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Memory cards – free to a good home – ADVERTISEMENT of sorts

    Hi again, The memory cards have found a home! Thanks, Paul Dodd


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Memory cards – free to a good home – ADVERTISEMENT of sorts

    Hi all, After sorting through my camera gear, I have a number of memory cards – both Compact Flash and SD – that are surplus to requirements. I am happy to drop them all in an envelope and send them to anyone that can offer them a good home. Sorry, but I won’t separate them, so you get the good with the bad! 2 x SanDisk Ultra II 8GB CF 1 x RiData Pro 4GB CF 1 x Kingston Elite Pro 2GB CF 2 x Kingston Elite Pro 1GB CF 1 x RiData Pro-2 1GB CF 1 x Canon 8MB CF (Yes, really!) 1 x RiData Pro 1GB SD 1 x Canon 32MB SD (unopened, and yes, really!) 1 x Canon 8MB SD (Yes, really!) 1 x SanDisk 2GB Mini-SD (with SD adaptor) First come, first served! Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Off topic – Total Lunar Eclipse, Apr 4, 2015

    Hi all, Sorry, not bird-related. For those interested, I took a sequence of photos of the Total Lunar Eclipse last night: http://paul.angrybluecat.com/Trips-and-Locations/2015/Total-Lunar-Eclipse-Ap r-2015/ Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Superzoom cameras

    I’m not a huge fan of superzoom point-and-shoot cameras (or “bridge cameras” as the manufacturers like to call them). I think that too many compromises are made with zooms of these ranges, and I think the sensors are too small, resulting in too much noise, but one thing is for sure, within these limitations they are impressive performers. Whilst I totally understand that there are alternatives to Nikon and Canon (such as Panasonic, Sony, Samsung and others), these two brands have a good proportion of this market. The following links are a review of Nikon’s new superzoom (83x) P900 camera, and a video, and stills, showing just what is possible with the sort of range that this camera offers: http://petapixel.com/2015/03/02/nikons-new-coolpix-p900-has-a-ridiculous-83x -zoom-range-of-24-2000mm/ http://petapixel.com/2015/03/26/check-out-the-nikon-d900s-ridiculous-83x-zoo m/ The following links are a cursory review of Canon’s competitive superzoom (65x) SX60HS camera and a video and stills showing the zoom capabilities of this camera: http://petapixel.com/2014/09/15/canon-pushes-bridge-camera-envelope-65x-supe rzoom-also-debuts-sharing-friendly-n2/ http://petapixel.com/2015/03/07/the-optical-zooms-on-compact-cameras-are-get ting-ridiculously-powerful/


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Sigma 150-600mm lens – was suitable camera

    For anyone that is interested, Digidirect in Melbourne has the Sigma 150-600mm lens in stock for both Canon and Nikon mounts. I’m not sure about other stores, and I can guarantee that mounts other than Canon and Nikon would be a special order. Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

  • Compact Cameras and Pelagics

    Hi everyone, If you’re not interested in cameras and photography then perhaps skip this posting. I have finally made time to process my photos from the December pelagic from Portland, Victoria. The pictures can be found here: http://paul.angrybluecat.com/Trips-and-Locations/2014/Portland-Pelagic-Dec-2 014/ These photos were all shot with the Nikon 1 compact (mirrorless) system rather than my usual Nikon D800 with 500mm and 300mm lens. I have a number of Nikon 1 bodies, but in this case I chose the Nikon 1 V2. I don’t have the latest V3 body, so I am unable to offer any comparisons currently. I used two lenses – the wide images were made with the 6-13mm lens (effectively 16.2-35.1mm) and the long shots were taken with the new 70-300mm lens (effectively 189-810mm). First, the positives. The Nikon 1 is incredibly light, even with the 70-300mm lens. With the V2 body, the 70-300mm lens is well balanced and is definitely not front-heavy. The 6-13mm lens is fun and is certainly more than wide enough for most purposes. The 70-300mm lens is simply spectacular. It is everything you could want in a telephoto zoom. At its full extent (effectively 810mm) it is brilliant for bird photography. I find the Nikon 1’s electronic viewfinder clear and responsive. If you attempt to manually focus the EVF automatically zooms to assist with focussing. Perhaps the single best feature of the camera, though, is it’s incredibly high frame rate – up to 60 frames per second! I shot the pelagic using the 15 frame per second mode because it allowed continuous autofocus. At rates of 15 frames per second and above the camera uses a silent electronic shutter rather than a mechanical one. Now the negatives. The camera uses a “CX” size sensor, which is quite small – I find the images quite noisy, even at relatively low ISOs. Whilst the 6-13mm lens is, of course, very wide, it actually has quite a lot of distortion, increasing towards the edge of the frame. I’m sure that this could be corrected in Photoshop or Lightroom – however, the standard lens correction provided with Lightroom does not do this. The vibration reduction in the 70-300mm lens is good, but certainly not up to being on a moving boat at the full extension – if you check my photos, very few were shot at 300mm (810mm) – hardly a surprise, really. Whilst the rig is quite sophisticated, the user interface in the camera are rather basic – much closer to a point-and-shoot than a DSLR. For instance, there is no histogram function, no focus peaking display for manual focus, no advanced functionality whatsoever. Autofocus is quite fast (not incredibly snappy, but workable). The autofocus was easily confused by the waves, meaning that many images were out of focus (with lovely, sharply focussed sea!) To my eye the images from this camera are slightly soft and (not surprisingly) lacking in fine detail when compared to the shots I would have achieved with the D800 and 500mm lens. I shot entirely in RAW, so I can’t comment on the relative quality of JPEG images from the camera. Because the camera is a Nikon, Lightroom and Photoshop support the RAW format completely and all post-processing functionality is available in those two applications. With my D800 and 500mm lens, I tend to set the camera to 1/1250 and f/8 for pelagics. I use f/8 to attempt to get sufficient depth of field to ensure that the whole bird is sharp (not always possible). With the much smaller sensor in the Nikon 1 I left the camera in Aperture Priority mode, set it to f/5.6 and left it there all day – relying on the fact that I would have much greater depth of field than the DSLR would have at f/8. In terms of comparison with other cameras, the Canon SX50 and SX60 come to mind – whilst they’re not exchangeable lens cameras like the Nikon 1, they are comparable in other ways, not the least that quite a few birders have one or the other of these cameras. Firstly, both Canons exceed the maximum zoom of the Nikon – the SX50 has a 1200mm equivalent and the SX60 has a 1360mm equivalent (compared with 810mm using my 70-300mm lens on the Nikon). I don’t think that this would make the slightest difference on a pelagic though, especially as I couldn’t use my camera at its maximum zoom. I would suspect that the optics in the Nikon 1 lenses that I was using, especially the 70-300mm would well exceed the quality available from either of the Canons (especially as the 70-300mm lens is built to the same standards as the best Nikon DSLR lens and has the advanced coating common to all other Nikon “N” lenses. The sensor size in the Canons is considerably smaller than in the Nikon, so would be considerably noisier. All in all, I think that for birders not wanting to expend many thousands of dollars for a DSLR and long lens, this setup is pretty good. The setup is lightweight so would suit someone not wanting to lug many kilograms around. Paul Dodd Docklands, Victoria


    Birding-Aus mailing list
    Birding-Aus@birding-aus.org
    To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org